Top Ten Agency vs Attorney Considerations

Specialized Expertise: Agencies with in-house counsel focus exclusively on debt collection, unlike general practitioners who may handle various legal matters.
Cost-Effective: Collection agencies often have more competitive pricing as their legal costs are amortized out over many cases for economies of scale.
Streamlined Process: With legal and collection services under one roof, the process is more efficient and consistant resulting in higher success rates.
Higher Recovery Rates: Specialized knowledge and negotiation tactics used by collection agencies typically result in higher recovery rates.
Pre-Litigation Resolution: In-house counsel can leverage legal knowledge to resolve cases before escalating to litigation, saving time and money.
Comprehensive Services: Agencies can handle everything from negotiations to litigation without needing to outsource.
Quick Turnaround: Agencies are typically more nimble and can act faster than law firms bogged down with various cases in multiple areas of practice. Timing is everything.
Focused Strategy: In-house legal teams are dedicated to debt collection and consistant discovery activities for debtor location and assets.
Enhanced Credibility: The presence of legal counsel within the agency adds weight to collection efforts, often leading to quicker debtor compliance.
Ongoing Legal Support: Continuous access to legal expertise ensures compliance and minimizes risk throughout the collection process.

grt2@frontier.com